2025.07.29 (Vrindavan Today News): In recent weeks, a troubling pattern has emerged among certain spiritual leaders in Vrindavan. Saints, who for centuries have been venerated as moral compasses of society, are now finding themselves at the center of growing controversy for making remarks that many view as misogynistic, regressive, and deeply damaging to the spiritual and social fabric of the nation.
The latest figure to stir public outrage is Sant Premanand Maharaj, whose remarks captured during a private conversation that later surfaced on social media, have sparked significant backlash. In the viral video, Maharaj is heard claiming that “out of 100 girls, only 2 to 4 are pure.” He goes on to suggest that young women today are more concerned with so-called “girlfriend-boyfriend culture,” labeling such behavior as “filthy.” In a sweeping generalization, he questions what kind of daughter-in-law such girls would make, implying a deterioration of traditional family values.
Though Maharaj did not spare men from criticism, acknowledging that “they too are not far behind and remain in contact with more than one woman,” it is his comments about women that have fueled an uproar. Many see his remarks not only as an affront to modern Indian women but as a direct contradiction to the values of compassion, inclusion, and respect that saints are traditionally meant to embody.
These comments come on the heels of a similarly controversial statement made by Aniruddhacharya, which had already triggered widespread anger, particularly among women. The situation escalated to such a degree that the National Commission for Women (NCW) was compelled to take suo motu cognizance of the matter.
“Saints Are Damaging the Image of Sanatan Dharma”
The response from the public and spiritual community has been swift and critical. Saurabh Dwivedi, a priest in Vrindavan, commented: “These unruly statements from saints are tarnishing the image of Sanatan Dharma. The revered saints of the past were builders of a harmonious society. But now, certain individuals are degrading the image of Braj (Vrindavan) through such inappropriate commentary.”
Other members of the religious and civic community have echoed similar sentiments. Chhail Bihari Mishra remarked, “Saints should elevate lives, not degrade women with such irresponsible statements. Such language does not suit a saint like Premanand Maharaj, and no one expected this from him.”
Vivek Mahajan, the National President of Garib Ekta Dal said, “Saints must never make such remarks against the daughters of India. Every Indian daughter is pure and does not require anyone’s certificate. This statement is an insult to all daughters,” he said.
Govind Goswami, a local resident offered a sharp critique: “What is happening to the saints of Vrindavan? Why are they constantly targeting women? The more we respect women, the more our culture will thrive. It seems they are chasing social media fame—at the cost of decency and truth.”
A Question of Morality, Relevance, and Responsibility
These incidents are sparking a broader cultural debate about the evolving role of spiritual figures in a modern, pluralistic society. Saints, once revered as beacons of spiritual wisdom and humility, are now facing scrutiny for statements that not only reflect outdated social constructs but also perpetuate harmful stereotypes, particularly regarding women’s purity, autonomy, and societal role.
That such comments are being made in Vrindavan – a land synonymous with Radha-Krishna devotion and divine feminine energy adds a layer of painful irony. Shri Radha, the eternal consort of Krishna, symbolizes the highest expression of love, sacrifice, and spiritual purity. To denigrate contemporary women in the name of morality, while worshipping Shri Radha with flowers and chants, is a contradiction that many can no longer tolerate.
What remains clear is that India’s citizens, particularly its women, are no longer willing to silently accept derogatory assessments of their character, least of all from those who claim spiritual authority. As the public discourse around gender, tradition, and reform deepens, so too does the call for a more accountable and compassionate spiritual leadership, one that uplifts rather than alienates, respects rather than judges.
